Real-World Effectiveness of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA): A Physician Survey on Failure Rates and Contributing Factors
Effectiveness of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA)
Keywords:
DMPA, contraceptive failure, adherence, side effectAbstract
Background:Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a widely used contraceptive, but real-world data on its performance remain limited.
Objective:
This study evaluates physician-reported experiences with DMPA, focusing on failure rates, side effects, and prescribing trends.
Methods:A cross-sectional survey of 34 obstetrician-gynecologists in Libya assessed: (1) contraceptive failure rates and causes, (2) side effect prevalence, (3) patient adherence behaviors, and (4) provider preferences. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative responses were thematically coded.
Results:Failure rates: 61.8% of physicians reported 0–1% failure (consistent with perfect use), while 29.4% observed 2–3% failure (attributed to non-compliance [32.4%] and improper administration [29.4%]).
Side effects: Irregular bleeding affected 52.9% of users; 38.2% experienced multiple concurrent side effects. Discontinuation due to side effects occurred in 38.2% of cases.
Prescribing patterns: 50% of providers preferentially recommended DMPA for specific patients (e.g., those needing estrogen-free options), while 35.3% favored alternatives due to adherence challenges.
Conclusions:
While DMPA demonstrates high efficacy in ideal use, real-world effectiveness is compromised by adherence barriers and side effects. Targeted interventions—including improved provider training, patient counseling, and reminder systems—could optimize outcomes. These findings support individualized contraceptive counseling and underscore the need for accessible alternatives in clinical practice.
References
Peipert JF, Madden T, Allsworth JE, Secura GM. Typical-use contraceptive failure rates: a pooled analysis of 17 longitudinal studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(3):270.e1-270.e19. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.037
Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):115.e1-115.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.002
Kaunitz AM, Teal SB, Lukes AS, Rios JL, Darney PD. Contraceptive efficacy and safety of DMPA-SC: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):915-922. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002878
Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2018;97(5):420-425. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.013
Bahamondes L, Ali M, Monteiro I, Fernandes A. Performance of contraceptive implants and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in clinical trials. Contraception. 2019;99(2):65-71. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.004
Bonny AE, Secic M, Cromer BA. Relationships between weight and bone mineral density in adolescents using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(2):167-171. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2015.08.008
Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Ott SM. Change in bone mineral density among adolescent women using and discontinuing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020;164(2):139-145. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.250
Darroch JE, Sully E, Biddlecom A. Adding it up: investing in sexual and reproductive health in low-income countries. Guttmacher Institute. 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/adding-it-up-investing-in-sexual-reproductive-health-2021
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lebda Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.