| Paper template |
AI-Policy
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy
1. General Principles
- The journal recognizes that AI tools are increasingly used in research and writing.
- AI cannot be listed as an author, since authorship requires accountability, responsibility, and the ability to consent.
- Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their work, regardless of AI assistance.
2. Permitted Uses
- Language editing and grammar improvement.
- Technical support (e.g., formatting references, generating figures with clear attribution).
- Data analysis support if transparently documented and validated by the authors.
3. Prohibited Uses
- Undisclosed AI‑generated content (text, figures, or data) presented as original human work.
- Fabrication of data, references, or results using AI.
- AI‑generated peer review reports — reviewers must provide their own independent evaluation.
4. Disclosure Requirements
- Authors must clearly state in the Methods or Acknowledgments section if AI tools were used, specifying:
- The tool name .
- The purpose (e.g., language editing, figure generation).
- Example statement:
- “We used ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2026) to improve the clarity of English grammar in the manuscript draft. No AI tool was used for data analysis or interpretation.”
5. Editorial and Reviewer Use
- Editors may use AI tools for technical checks (plagiarism, grammar, formatting), but not for decision‑making.
- Reviewers must not submit AI‑generated reviews without their own critical input.
6. Ethics and Accountability
- Any misuse of AI (plagiarism, data fabrication, lack of disclosure) will be treated as research misconduct.


